What will you prefer Dining chair with armrest/without.?
Question:
Answers:
Well, if you have a more decorative formal area, then I would say with arm rests. If it's more casual, then without.
W/O
1] the ones with arms are heavier
2] they take up more space
3] if you must by some with arms, use them at head and foot of table
That would depend on the design for me. A more homey, classic looking dining set --no arm rest
A larger, more expensive looking set, could have arm rests..ex: a marble top table with leather high back chairs.
without.
Too bulky with
Without definetely.
well i like armchairs cause its got some place where u can put your arms (of course) but their bulky they can get in the way and they are heavy any ones without arms are lighter but, you have no where u can put your arms.
The chairs with the arms are meant for the head of the table and usually there are two. I had a dining set that these arms did not slip under the table. They would bump into the table so I hated those chairs because no one could squeeze by me. I now have a new dining set and the arms slip under the table so it is not a problem for me, but check your chair and table out for this situation if you are buying a new set.. The chairs with arms are more costly and that is one reason people choose armless chairs.
Without.
Arms take up space and are hard to get out of when you have many guests crammed around your table.
When in doubt, go functional over looks.
More Related Questions & Answers...